[Jul-2024] ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Dumps Pass with Updated 2024 PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam [Q45-Q68]

Home » All Exams » [Jul-2024] ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Dumps Pass with Updated 2024 PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam [Q45-Q68]

4/5 - (1 vote)

[Jul-2024] ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Dumps Pass with Updated 2024 PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam

Free ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Dumps to Pass Exam Easily

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor certification exam is designed for professionals who wish to become certified auditors for information security management systems (ISMS) based on the ISO/IEC 27001 standard. PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam certification is globally recognized and provides individuals with the necessary skills and knowledge to conduct effective audits of an organization’s information security management system.

NEW QUESTION 45
Which one of the following options describes the main purpose of a Stage 1 audit?

To determine readiness for Stage 2

To check for legal compliance by the organisation

To get to know the organisation

To compile the audit plan

NEW QUESTION 46
Integrity of data means

Accuracy and completeness of the data

Data should be viewable at all times

Data should be accessed by only the right people

NEW QUESTION 47
After completing Stage 1 and in preparation for a Stage 2 initial certification audit, the auditee informs the audit team leader that they wish to extend the audit scope to include two additional sites that have recently been acquired by the organisation.
Considering this information, what action would you expect the audit team leader to take?

Increase the length of the Stage 2 audit to include the extra sites

Obtain information about the additional sites to inform the certification body

Arrange to complete a remote Stage 1 audit of the two sites using a video conferencing platform

Inform the auditee that the request can be accepted but a full Stage 1 audit must be repeated

NEW QUESTION 48
You are an experienced ISMS audit team leader, assisting an auditor in training to write their first audit report.
You want to check the auditor in training’s understanding of terminology relating to the contents of an audit report and chose to do this by presenting the following examples.
For each example, you ask the auditor in training what the correct term is that describes the activity Match the activity to the description.

NEW QUESTION 49
Implement plan on a test basis – this comes under which section of PDCA

Plan

Act

Check

NEW QUESTION 50
There is a scheduled fire drill in your facility. What should you do?

Participate in the drill

Excuse yourself by saying you have an urgent deliverable

Call in sick

None of the above

NEW QUESTION 51
Which two of the following phrases would apply to “act” in relation to the Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle for a business process?

Auditing processes

Planning changes

Measuring objectives

Resetting objectives

Achieving improvements

Verifying training

NEW QUESTION 52
There is a scheduled fire drill in your facility. What should you do?

Participate in the drill

Excuse yourself by saying you have an urgent deliverable

Call in sick

None of the above

NEW QUESTION 53
Auditor competence is a combination of knowledge and skills. Which two of the following activities are predominately related to “knowledge”?

Understanding how to identify findings

Designing a checklist

Follow an audit trail deviating from the prepared checklist

Communicate with the auditee

Determining how to seek evidence from the auditee

Determining what evidence to gather

NEW QUESTION 54
An employee caught with offense of abusing the internet, such as P2P file sharing or video/audio streaming, will not receive a warning for committing such act but will directly receive an IR.

True

False

NEW QUESTION 55
Information or data that are classified as ______ do not require labeling.

Public

Internal

Confidential

Highly Confidential

NEW QUESTION 56
In order to take out a fire insurance policy, an administration office must determine the value of the data that it manages.
Which factor is [b]not[/b] important for determining the value of data for an organization?

The content of data.

The degree to which missing, incomplete or incorrect data can be recovered.

The indispensability of data for the business processes.

The importance of the business processes that make use of the data.

NEW QUESTION 57
You ask the IT Manager why the organisation still uses the mobile app while personal data encryption and pseudonymization tests failed. Also, whether the Service Manager is authorized to approve the test.
The IT Manager explains the test results should be approved by him according to the software security management procedure. The reason why the encryption and pseudonymization functions failed is that these functions heavily slowed down the system and service performance. An extra 150% of resources are needed to cover this. The Service Manager agreed that access control is good enough and acceptable. That’s why the Service Manager signed the approval.
You sample one of the medical staff’s mobile and found that ABC’s healthcare mobile app, version 1.01 is installed. You found that version 1.01 has no test record.
The IT Manager explains that because of frequent ransomware attacks, the outsourced mobile app development company gave a free minor update on the tested software, performed an emergency release of the updated software, and gave a verbal guarantee that there will be no impact on any security functions. Based on his 20 years of information security experience, there is no need to re-test.
You are preparing the audit findings Select two options that are correct.

There is NO nonconformity (NC). The IT Manager demonstrates he is fully competent. (Relevant to clause 7.2)

There is a nonconformity (NC). The IT Manager does not comply with the software security management procedure. (Relevant to clause 8.1, control A.8.30)

There is a nonconformity (NC). The organisation does not control planned changes and review the consequences of unintended changes. (Relevant to clause 8.1)

There is an opportunity for improvement (OI). The organisation selects an external service provider based on the extent of free services it will provide. (Relevant to clause 8.1, control A.5.21)

There is NO nonconformity (NC). The IT Manager demonstrates good leadership. (Relevant to clause
5.1, control 5.4)

There is an opportunity for improvement (OI). The IT Manager should make the decision to continue the service based on appropriate testing. (Relevant to clause 8.1, control A.8.30)

Explanation
According to ISO 27001:2022 Annex A Control 8.30, the organisation shall ensure that externally provided processes, products or services that are relevant to the information security management system are controlled. This includes developing and entering into licensing agreements that cover code ownership and intellectual property rights, and implementing appropriate contractual requirements related to secure design and coding in accordance with Annex A 8.25 and 8.2912 In this case, the organisation and the developer have performed security tests that failed, which indicates that the secure design and coding requirements of Annex A 8.29 were not met. The IT Manager explains that the encryption and pseudonymization functions failed because they slowed down the system and service performance, and that an extra 150% of resources are needed to cover this. However, this does not justify the acceptance of the test results by the Service Manager, who is not authorised to approve the test according to the software security management procedure. The Service Manager should have consulted with the IT Manager, who is the owner of the process, and followed the procedure for handling nonconformities and corrective actions. The Service Manager’s decision to continue the service based on access control alone exposes the organisation to the risk of compromising the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of personal data processed by the mobile app. Therefore, there is a nonconformity (NC) with clause 8.1, control A.8.30.
According to ISO 27001:2022 Clause 8.1, the organisation shall plan, implement and control the processes needed to meet information security requirements, and to implement the actions determined in Clause 6.1. The organisation shall also control planned changes and review the consequences of unintended changes, taking action to mitigate any adverse effects, as necessary12 In this case, the organisation has not controlled the planned change of the mobile app from version 1.0 to version 1.01, which was a minor update provided by the outsourced developer in response to frequent ransomware attacks. The IT Manager explains that the developer performed an emergency release of the updated software, and gave a verbal guarantee that there will be no impact on any security functions.
However, this is not sufficient to ensure that the change is properly assessed, tested, documented, and approved before deployment. The IT Manager should have followed the change management process and procedure, and verified that the updated software meets the security requirements and does not introduce any new vulnerabilities or risks. The IT Manager’s reliance on his 20 years of information security experience and the developer’s verbal guarantee is not a valid basis for skipping the re-testing of the software. Therefore, there is a nonconformity (NC) with clause 8.1.
References:
1: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor (Information Security Management Systems) Course by CQI and IRCA Certified Training 1 2: ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor Training Course by PECB 2

NEW QUESTION 58
You are an experienced ISMS audit team leader guiding an auditor in training. Your team has just completed a third-party surveillance audit of a mobile telecom provider. The auditor in training asks you how you intend to prepare for the Closing meeting. Which four of the following are appropriate responses?

I will advise the auditee that the purpose of the closing meeting is for the audit team to communicate our findings. It is not an opportunity for the auditee to challenge the findings

I will instruct my audit team to wait outside the auditee’s offices so we can leave as quickly as possible after the closing meeting. This saves our time and the client’s time too

It is not necessary to prepare for the closing meeting. Once you have carried out as many audits as I have you already know what needs to be discussed

I will schedule a closing meeting with the auditee’s representatives at which the audit conclusions will be presented

I will contact head office to ensure our invoice has been paid, If not, I will cancel the closing meeting and temporarily withhold the audit report

I will discuss any follow-up required with my audit team

I will review and, as appropriate, approve my teams audit conclusions

I will review the audit evidence and the audit findings with the rest of the team

According to ISO 19011:2018, which provides guidelines for auditing management systems, clause 6.6 requires the audit team leader to conduct a closing meeting with the auditee’s representatives at the end of the audit to present the audit conclusions and any findings1. The closing meeting should also provide an opportunity for the auditee to ask questions, clarify issues, acknowledge the findings, and comment on the audit process1. Therefore, when preparing for the closing meeting, an ISMS auditor should consider the following actions:
* I will advise the auditee that the purpose of the closing meeting is for the audit team to communicate our findings. It is not an opportunity for the auditee to challenge these: This action is appropriate because it reflects the fact that the auditor has followed a systematic and consistent approach to collecting and evaluating audit evidence and reaching audit conclusions. The auditor should advise the auditee that the purpose of the closing meeting is for the audit team to communicate their findings, which are based on objective evidence and professional judgement. The auditor should also explain that it is not an opportunity for the auditee to challenge these findings, as they have already been discussed and confirmed during the audit. However, the auditor should also invite the auditee to ask questions, clarify issues, acknowledge the findings, and comment on the audit process1.
* I will schedule a closing meeting with the auditee’s representatives at which the audit conclusions will be presented: This action is appropriate because it reflects the fact that the auditor has followed a
* planned and agreed audit programme and schedule. The auditor should schedule a closing meeting with the auditee’s representatives at which the audit conclusions will be presented, in accordance with clause
6.6 of ISO 19011:20181. The auditor should also ensure that the closing meeting is attended by those responsible for managing or implementing the ISMS, as well as any other relevant parties1.
* I will discuss any follow-up required with my audit team: This action is appropriate because it reflects the fact that the auditor has followed a risk-based approach to determining and reporting any follow-up actions required by the auditee or the certification body. The auditor should discuss any follow-up required with their audit team, such as verifying corrective actions for nonconformities or conducting a subsequent audit1. The auditor should also document any follow-up actions in the audit report1.
* I will review and, as appropriate, approve my teams audit conclusions: This action is appropriate because it reflects the fact that the auditor has followed a rigorous and professional process to reaching and reporting audit conclusions. The auditor should review and, as appropriate, approve their teams audit conclusions, which are based on objective evidence and professional judgement. The auditor should also ensure that their teams audit conclusions are consistent with the audit objectives and scope, and reflect the overall performance and conformity of the ISMS1.

NEW QUESTION 59
During a Stage 1 audit opening meeting, the Management System Representative (MSR) asks to extend the audit scope to include a new site overseas which they have expanded into since the certification application was made.
Select two options for how the auditor should respond.

Advise the MSR that an extension of the scope may be incorporated but will have to go through established procedures

Advise the MSR that the audit scope has been determined based on their initial application so the audit has to proceed as planned

Suggest that the MSR cancels the audit contract and reapplies for the new situation

Determine whether the Management System covers the processes at the new site and, if so, proceed with the audit

Advise the MSR that, within the existing scope, the new work area can be included without any problem

Confirm that the auditor will advise the auditee that the audit scope will be revised to include the new work area

The correct options for how the auditor should respond are:
* A. Advise the MSR that an extension of the scope may be incorporated but will have to go through established procedures
* D. Determine whether the Management System covers the processes at the new site and, if so, proceed with the audit These options are consistent with the ISO/IEC 27006:2015 standard, which states that any changes to the scope of certification should be notified by the client to the certification body, and that the certification body should evaluate and decide on these changes in accordance with its procedures1. The auditor should also verify that the ISMS is implemented and maintained at all sites included in the scope of certification1.
The other options are not appropriate for how the auditor should respond, because:
* B. Advise the MSR that the audit scope has been determined based on their initial application so the audit has to proceed as planned: This option is too rigid and does not allow for any flexibility or adaptation to the client’s situation. The auditor should be open to consider any changes to the scope of certification that may have occurred since the initial application, as long as they are properly notified and evaluated by the certification body.
* C. Suggest that the MSR cancels the audit contract and reapplies for the new situation: This option is too drastic and unnecessary, as it would cause delays and costs for both the client and the certification body.
The auditor should not suggest that the client cancels the audit contract, but rather that they follow the established procedures for requesting and approving an extension of the scope of certification.
* E. Advise the MSR that, within the existing scope, the new work area can be included without any problem: This option is too lenient and does not ensure that the new work area meets the requirements
* of ISO/IEC 27001 and the ISMS. The auditor should not assume that the new work area can be included within the existing scope without any problem, but rather that they need to verify that the ISMS is implemented and maintained at the new site, and that any changes to the scope of certification are approved by the certification body.
* F. Confirm that the auditor will advise the auditee that the audit scope will be revised to include the new work area: This option is too presumptuous and does not respect the authority of the certification body.
The auditor should not confirm that they will revise the audit scope to include the new work area, but rather that they will advise the certification body of the client’s request for an extension of the scope of certification, and wait for their decision.

NEW QUESTION 60
Which two of the following are examples of audit methods that ‘do not’ involve human interaction?

Conducting an interview using a teleconferencing platform

Performing a review of auditees procedures in preparation for an audit

Reviewing the auditee’s response to an audit finding

Analysing data by remotely accessing the auditee’s server

Observing work performed by remote surveillance

Confirming the date and time of the audit

NEW QUESTION 61
Scenario 6: Sinvestment is an insurance company that offers home, commercial, and life insurance. The company was founded in North Carolina, but have recently expanded in other locations, including Europe and Africa.
Sinvestment is committed to complying with laws and regulations applicable to their industry and preventing any information security incident. They have implemented an ISMS based on ISO/IEC 27001 and have applied for ISO/IEC 27001 certification.
Two auditors were assigned by the certification body to conduct the audit. After signing a confidentiality agreement with Sinvestment. they started the audit activities. First, they reviewed the documentation required by the standard, including the declaration of the ISMS scope, information security policies, and internal audits reports. The review process was not easy because, although Sinvestment stated that they had a documentation procedure in place, not all documents had the same format.
Then, the audit team conducted several interviews with Sinvestment’s top management to understand their role in the ISMS implementation. All activities of the stage 1 audit were performed remotely, except the review of documented information, which took place on-site, as requested by Sinvestment.
During this stage, the auditors found out that there was no documentation related to information security training and awareness program. When asked, Sinvestment’s representatives stated that the company has provided information security training sessions to all employees. Stage 1 audit gave the audit team a general understanding of Sinvestment’s operations and ISMS.
The stage 2 audit was conducted three weeks after stage 1 audit. The audit team observed that the marketing department (which was not included in the audit scope) had no procedures in place to control employees’ access rights. Since controlling employees’ access rights is one of the ISO/IEC 27001 requirements and was included in the information security policy of the company, the issue was included in the audit report. In addition, during stage 2 audit, the audit team observed that Sinvestment did not record logs of user activities.
The procedures of the company stated that “Logs recording user activities should be retained and regularly reviewed,” yet the company did not present any evidence of the implementation of such procedure.
During all audit activities, the auditors used observation, interviews, documented information review, analysis, and technical verification to collect information and evidence. All the audit findings during stages 1 and 2 were analyzed and the audit team decided to issue a positive recommendation for certification.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
The audit team reviewed Sinvestment’s documented information on-site, as requested by the company. Is this acceptable?

Yes, Sinvestment has the right to require that no document is carried off-site during the documented information review

No, Sinvestment cannot decide where the documentation review take place, since a confidentiality agreement was signed prior to stage 1 audit

No, the combination of on-site and off-site activities can impact the audit negatively

NEW QUESTION 62
A decent visitor is roaming around without visitor’s ID. As an employee you should do the following, except:

Say “hi” and offer coffee

Call the receptionist and inform about the visitor

Greet and ask him what is his business

Escort him to his destination

NEW QUESTION 63
Which two of the following options do not participate in a first-party audit?

A certification body auditor

An audit team from an accreditation body

An auditor certified by CQI and IRCA

An auditor from a consultancy organisation

An auditor trained in the CQI and IRCA scheme

An auditor trained in the organization

NEW QUESTION 64
You are performing an ISMS audit at a nursing home where residents always wear an electronic wristband for monitoring their location, heartbeat, and blood pressure. The wristband automatically uploads this data to a cloud server for healthcare monitoring and analysis by staff.
You now wish to verify that the information security policy and objectives have been established by top management. You are sampling the mobile device policy and identify a security objective of this policy is “to ensure the security of teleworking and use of mobile devices” The policy states the following controls will be applied in order to achieve this.
Personal mobile devices are prohibited from connecting to the nursing home network, processing, and storing residents’ data.
The company’s mobile devices within the ISMS scope shall be registered in the asset register.
The company’s mobile devices shall implement or enable physical protection, i.e., pin-code protected screen lock/unlock, facial or fingerprint to unlock the device.
The company’s mobile devices shall have a regular backup.
To verify that the mobile device policy and objectives are implemented and effective, select three options for your audit trail.

Interview the reception personnel to make sure all visitor and employee bags are checked before entering the nursing home

Review visitors’ register book to make sure no visitor can have their personal mobile phone in the nursing home

Review the internal audit report to make sure the IT department has been audited

Review the asset register to make sure all personal mobile devices are registered

Sampling some mobile devices from on-duty medical staff and validate the mobile device information with the asset register

Review the asset register to make sure all company’s mobile devices are registered

Interview the supplier of the devices to make sure they are aware of the ISMS policy

Interview top management to verify their involvement in establishing the information security policy and the information security objectives

Explanation
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, which specifies the requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining and continually improving an information security management system (ISMS), clause 5.2 requires top management to establish an information security policy that provides the framework for setting information security objectives1. Clause 6.2 requires top management to ensure that the information security objectives are established at relevant functions and levels1. Therefore, when verifying that the information security policy and objectives have been established by top management, an ISMS auditor should review relevant documents and records that demonstrate top management’s involvement and commitment.
To verify that the mobile device policy and objectives are implemented and effective, an ISMS auditor should review relevant documents and records that demonstrate how the policy and objectives are communicated, monitored, measured, analyzed, and evaluated. The auditor should also sample and verify the implementation of the controls that are stated in the policy.
Three options for the audit trail that are relevant to verifying the mobile device policy and objectives are:
* Review the internal audit report to make sure the IT department has been audited: This option is relevant because it can provide evidence of how the IT department, which is responsible for managing the mobile devices and their security, has been evaluated for its conformity and effectiveness in implementing the mobile device policy and objectives. The internal audit report can also reveal any nonconformities, corrective actions, or opportunities for improvement related to the mobile device policy and objectives.
* Sampling some mobile devices from on-duty medical staff and validate the mobile device information with the asset register: This option is relevant because it can provide evidence of how the mobile devices that are used by the medical staff, who are involved in processing and storing residents’ data, are registered in the asset register and have physical protection enabled. This can verify the implementation and effectiveness of two of the controls that are stated in the mobile device policy.
* Review the asset register to make sure all company’s mobile devices are registered: This option is relevant because it can provide evidence of how the company’s mobile devices that are within the ISMS scope are identified and accounted for. This can verify the implementation and effectiveness of one of the controls that are stated in the mobile device policy.
The other options for the audit trail are not relevant to verifying the mobile device policy and objectives, as they are not related to the policy or objectives or their implementation or effectiveness. For example:
* Interview the reception personnel to make sure all visitor and employee bags are checked before entering the nursing home: This option is not relevant because it does not provide evidence of how the mobile device policy and objectives are implemented or effective. It may be related to another policy or objective regarding physical security or access control, but not specifically to mobile devices.
* Review visitors’ register book to make sure no visitor can have their personal mobile phone in the nursing home: This option is not relevant because it does not provide evidence of how the mobile device policy and objectives are implemented or effective. It may be related to another policy or objective
* regarding information security awareness or compliance, but not specifically to mobile devices.
* Interview the supplier of the devices to make sure they are aware of the ISMS policy: This option is not relevant because it does not provide evidence of how the mobile device policy and objectives are implemented or effective. It may be related to another policy or objective regarding information security within supplier relationships, but not specifically to mobile devices.
* Interview top management to verify their involvement in establishing the information security policy and the information security objectives: This option is not relevant because it does not provide evidence of how the mobile device policy and objectives are implemented or effective. It may be related to verifying that the information security policy and objectives have been established by top management, but not specifically to mobile devices.
References: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 – Information technology – Security techniques – Information security management systems – Requirements

NEW QUESTION 65
After a fire has occurred, what repressive measure can be taken?

Extinguishing the fire after the fire alarm sounds

Buying in a proper fire insurance policy

Repairing all systems after the fire

NEW QUESTION 66
The following are definitions of Information, except:

accurate and timely data

specific and organized data for a purpose

mature and measurable data

can lead to understanding and decrease in uncertainty

NEW QUESTION 67
Select the words that best complete the sentence:
To complete the sentence with the word(s) click on the blank section you want to complete so that it is highlighted in red, and then click on the application text from the options below. Alternatively, you may drag and drop the option to the appropriate blank section.

NEW QUESTION 68
An employee caught temporarily storing an MP3 file in his workstation will not receive an IR.

True

False

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor certification exam is a rigorous and challenging assessment of an individual’s knowledge and skills related to information security management. It is an excellent way for professionals to demonstrate their expertise in this field and advance their careers.

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Dumps, ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Practice Test Questions: https://www.braindumpspass.com/PECB/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-practice-exam-dumps.html

[Jul-2024] ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Dumps Pass with Updated 2024 PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam [Q45-Q68]

More Posts

Check the Free demo of our PRINCE2-Foundation Exam Dumps with 465 Questions [Q151-Q165]

Authentic Best resources for AD0-E906 Test Engine Practice Exam [Q14-Q35]

[2024] JN0-460 Actual Exam Dumps, JN0-460 Practice Test [Q30-Q54]

[Nov 15, 2024] Fully Updated LPIC 2 (201-450) Certification Sample Questions [Q43-Q60]

Recent Comments

Archives

Categories

Post: [Jul-2024] ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Dumps Pass with Updated 2024 PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam [Q45-Q68]

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

[Jul-2024] ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Dumps Pass with Updated 2024 PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam [Q45-Q68]

More Posts

Check the Free demo of our PRINCE2-Foundation Exam Dumps with 465 Questions [Q151-Q165]

Authentic Best resources for AD0-E906 Test Engine Practice Exam [Q14-Q35]

[2024] JN0-460 Actual Exam Dumps, JN0-460 Practice Test [Q30-Q54]

[Nov 15, 2024] Fully Updated LPIC 2 (201-450) Certification Sample Questions [Q43-Q60]

Recent Comments

Archives

Categories

other exams

Post: [Jul-2024] ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Dumps Pass with Updated 2024 PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam [Q45-Q68]

Leave a Reply Cancel reply